Constance MARTIN, individually and as Administratrix of the estate of Harris T. Martin, deceased, Plaintiff,
v.
MAPCO AMMONIA PIPELINE, INC., Defendant.
Martin BELL and Dianna Bell, Plaintiffs,
v.
MAPCO AMMONIA PIPELINE, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 13, 1994.
Memorandum and Order On Reconsideration November 1, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Curtis L. Tideman, Lathrop & Norquist, Overland Park, KS, Douglas R. Dalgleish, Thomas S. Stewart, Lathrop & Norquist, Kansas City, MO, for plaintiffs.
Bradley S. Russell, Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown & Enochs, Chartered, Overland Park, KS, Leonard J. Johnson, Mark E. Harris, Morrison & Hecker, Kansas City, MO, Dana M. Harris, Harris, McCausland & Schmitt, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for Mid-America Pipeline Co.
Ronald D. Montieth, Eric T. Swanson, R. Alexander Pryor, Knipmeyer, McCann, Smith, Manz & Gotfredson, Kansas City, MO, for Mapco Ammonia Pipeline, Inc.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on the following motions:
Plaintiffs' motion in limine to exclude evidence of the federal Pipeline Safety Act and its regulations (Doc. 95 in case 93-2218); and Plaintiffs' motion to amend the pretrial orders (Doc. 109 in 93-2218 and Doc. 82 in 93-2303).
For the reasons set forth below, the motions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.