BANAITIS v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD.

A8912-07357; CA A70113.

879 P.2d 1288 (1994)

129 Or. App. 371

Sigitas BANAITIS, Respondent— Cross-Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD., and Bank of California, N.A., Appellants— Cross-Respondents, and Karen LESH, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause, for appellants—cross-respondents. With him on the briefs were Black Helterline, Michael O. Moran and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen.

Charles J. Merten and John Paul Graff, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent— cross-appellant. With them on the briefs were Merten & Associates, Graff & O'Neil and Glen H. Downs.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff compensatory damages on his claim for wrongful discharge against defendant The Bank of California, N.A. (BanCal), and on his claim for interference with a contractual relationship against defendant Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. (MBL). Plaintiff cross-appeals a judgment notwithstanding the verdict that deprived him of a jury award of punitive damages against both defendants.1 We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases