RAMOS v. BOEHRINGER MANHEIM CORP.

No. 90-0416 CIV.

896 F.Supp. 1213 (1994)

Pedro A. RAMOS, M.D., Plaintiff, v. BOEHRINGER MANHEIM CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

September 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, P.A., Miami, FL by R.W. Payne and A. Francisco Areces, Parkhurst, Wendel & Rossi, Alexandria, VA by Roger W. Parkhurst, for plaintiff.

Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN by Donald E. Knebel and Mark D. Janis, Shutts & Bowen, Miami, FL by John T. Kolinski, for defendant.


MISHLER, District Judge.

Before the court is plaintiff's motion for a new trial to reopen and vacate its judgment pursuant to Rule 59(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in the alternative, for amended and new conclusions of law and findings of fact, and amended or new judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The background of this case is discussed in this Court's Memorandum and of Decision and Order dated August 16...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases