STATE v. WILKINS

No. 20158.

868 P.2d 1231 (1994)

125 Idaho 215

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randall Floyd WILKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 1993 Term.

February 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margolin, Arguimbau & Battson, San Francisco, CA, and Manweiler, Bevis & Cameron, P.A., Boise, for defendant-appellant. Ephraim Margolin argued.

Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., and Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued, Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.


JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal sentencing case. We conclude that the trial court improperly required the defendant, who had pleaded guilty, to testify for the prosecution at sentencing concerning matters beyond the facts of the case and concerning matters beyond what was necessary at the plea hearing to establish that the defendant pleaded guilty freely and voluntarily. We also conclude that the trial court improperly required the defendant's personal psychiatrist...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases