1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 868 P.2d
  5. 868 P.2d 1224 (1994)
 

RHODEHOUSE v. STUTTS

No. 19318.

868 P.2d 1224 (1994)

125 Idaho 208

Cleon L. RHODEHOUSE and Norma R. Rhodehouse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dr. B. Shields STUTTS, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, April 1993 Term.

February 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent A. Higgins, Idaho Falls, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Richard L. Stubbs argued.

TROUT, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case in which the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant doctor. The trial court found that the doctor's affidavit submitted by plaintiff was not admissible evidence under I.R.C.P. 56(e) because there was an insufficient foundation to show the doctor's familiarity with the local standard of care. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases