MATTER OF RAGLAND v. NYCHA


201 A.D.2d 7 (1994)

In the Matter of Karl Ragland, Respondent, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 5, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris, Duffy, Alonso & Marulli, New York City (Joseph T. Glynn of counsel), for appellant.

Abraham Hecht, Forest Hills (Warren S. Hecht on the brief), for respondent.

ROSENBLATT, PIZZUTO and ALTMAN, JJ., concur.


SULLIVAN, J. P.

On this appeal we are called upon to consider the effect and interplay of CPL 160.50 (sealing of records upon termination of criminal action in favor of the accused) and General Municipal Law § 50-e (notice of claim). Since the Supreme Court did not give proper consideration to the impact of CPL 160.50 in this case, we have modified the order by imposing certain conditions.

I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases