CITY OF EUGENE v. KRUK

91-50006; CA A71272.

875 P.2d 1190 (1994)

128 Or. App. 415

CITY OF EUGENE, Respondent, v. Kathy Kay KRUK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Spinney, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jens Schmidt, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Floyd F. Prozanski, Jr., and Harrang Long Watkinson Arnold & Laird, P.C.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction under Eugene Municipal Code § 4.907 (EC § 4.907), which prohibits conduct that interferes with a police officer's lawful performance of a duty. We reversed the conviction on the ground that the ordinance was preempted by state law. City of Eugene v. Kruk, 115 Or.App. 494, 839 P.2d 250 (1992). On review, the Supreme Court vacated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases