1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 875 P.2d
  5. 875 P.2d 1182 (1994)
 

MEDFORD CORP. v. SAIF CORP.

Agency Nos. 92-03563 and 92-03562; CA A79649.

875 P.2d 1182 (1994)

128 Or. App. 119

In the Matter of the Compensation of Dean M. Hunsaker, Claimant. MEDFORD CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Dean M. Hunsaker, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Scott Plouse, argued the cause, Medford, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cowling & Heysell.

Steven Cotton, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued, the cause, for respondent SAIF. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

No appearance, for respondent Hunsaker.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Employer, Medford Corporation (Medco), a self-insured employer, seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order holding that Medco is responsible for claimant's work-related hearing loss. We affirm the Board.

Claimant suffered bilateral hearing loss while working for Medco between 1954 and 1991, during which time he was exposed to noise from chain saws and air compressors. Medco was insured by SAIF until July 1, 1988, at which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases