1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 859 F.Supp.
  5. 859 F.Supp. 1197 (1994)
 

JOHNSTON v. SO

Civ. No. 1:89CV274.

859 F.Supp. 1197 (1994)

Newman JOHNSTON III and Phillip C. Asher, Plaintiffs, v. Bing T. SO and May So, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division.

August 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newman Johnston, III, pro se.

Phillip C. Asher, pro se.

James Fenton, Barrett and McNagny, Fort Wayne, IN, John H. Shean, Bloomington, IN, for defendants.

ORDER

WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendants Bing T. So's and May So's (hereinafter, "Sos") Motion for Summary Judgment filed on May 10, 1994. Plaintiffs Newman Johnston III (hereinafter, "Johnston") and Phillip C. Asher (hereinafter, "Asher") have not responded to the Sos Motion. For the following reasons, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases