1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 882 P.2d
  5. 882 P.2d 1126 (1994)
 

SCOVILL v. CITY OF ASTORIA

90-2134; CA A75790.

882 P.2d 1126 (1994)

130 Or. App. 425

Marilyn Ann SCOVILL, By and Through the Personal Representative of her Estate, Naomi Scovill HUBBARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF ASTORIA, a municipal corporation, and James M. Guynup, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 5, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet M. Schroer and Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, Portland, for motion.

No appearance contra.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RICHARDSON, C.J., and RIGGS, J.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant city moves for reconsideration of our opinion, 129 Or.App. 240, 878 P.2d 1127 (1994), pursuant to ORAP 6.25. It points out that we failed to address its cross-assignment of error. The city is correct, and the omission was unintentional.

The city cross-assigns error to the trial court's denial of the city's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases