BENEFITS COMMUNICATION CORP. v. KLIEFORTH

No. 92-CV-996.

642 A.2d 1299 (1994)

BENEFITS COMMUNICATION CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. Laurette C. KLIEFORTH, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. William Groscup, with whom Steven G. Barringer, Washington, DC, John M. Husband, and Brian M. Mumaugh, Denver, CO, were on the brief, for appellants.

Robert B. Fitzpatrick, with whom Mark D. Laponsky and Jonathan R. Topazian, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before FERREN, Acting Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and KING, Associate Judges.


KING, Associate Judge:

Appellee Laurette C. Klieforth ("employee") filed a complaint against appellants Great West Life Assurance Co. ("Great West") and its subsidiary Benefits Communication Corporation ("BCC"), who was her employer, alleging appellants had denied her a promotion on the basis of her sex in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act ("Human Rights Act").1 Shortly after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases