U.S. v. WRIGHT

No. IP 93-1402 C.

868 F.Supp. 1070 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. WRIGHT, Lois W. Wright, Robinson Construction, Romona Quarry and Bloomington Asphalt Co., Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

July 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Kieper, Deputy U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney's Office, Indianapolis, IN and Douglas W. Snoeyenbos, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Duane R. Denton and Mary H. Watts, Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants.


ENTRY AND ORDER

STECKLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendants, Daniel A. Wright and Lois W. Wright ("Dan and Lois Wright"), for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). Having reviewed the motion and considered the supporting and opposing memoranda of law, the Court concludes that the motion should be granted. The following discussion constitutes the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases