BENNETT v. MAASS

92C10388; CA A77473.

886 P.2d 1043 (1994)

131 Or. App. 557

Oliver Nelson BENNETT, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and R. Victoria Roe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for motion.

David W. Knofler and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., contra.

Before RIGGS, P.J., RICHARDSON, C.J., and De MUNIZ, J.


On Respondent's Motion to Dismiss April 4, 1994.

De MUNIZ, Judge.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it presents "no substantial question of law." ORS 138.660.1 We agree and allow the motion.

In the post-conviction proceeding, petitioner contended, inter alia, that his trial attorney's failure to investigate and obtain scientific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases