1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 886 P.2d
  5. 886 P.2d 1041 (1994)
 

BOISE CASCADE CORP. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY

92-DOF-007 and 93-DOF-002; CA A78968 (Control) and CA A79458.

886 P.2d 1041 (1994)

131 Or. App. 552

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF FORESTRY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip D. Chadsey, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Charles F. Adams and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey.

Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

De MUNIZ, Judge.

In Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 131 Or.App. 538, 886 P.2d 1033 (1994), we held that the circuit court erred in dismissing Boise Cascade's inverse condemnation action arising out of the Board of Forestry's ("board") orders prohibiting or restricting Boise Cascade from logging timber on property that contains or is proximate to a spotted owl nesting site. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases