Cheryl ALMGREN, Appellee,
v.
RUSH-PRESBYTERIAN-ST. LUKE'S MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant.
Judith TESTIN et al., Appellees,
v.
DREYER MEDICAL CLINIC et al. (Dreyer Medical Clinic, Appellant).
Supreme Court of Illinois.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 19, 1994.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 15, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
George F. Galland, Jr., Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C., Hugh C. Griffin and Diane I. Jennings, of Lord, Bissell & Brook, and Alfred C. Tisdahl, Jr., and Randall J. Gudmundson, of French, Kezelis & Kominiarek, Chicago, for appellant Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center.
Ronald G. Fleisher and Charles E. Tannen, of Karlin & Fleisher, Chicago (David A. Novoselsky and Linda A. Bryceland, of David A. Novoselsky & Associates, of counsel), for appellee Cheryl Almgren.
Howard C. Ryan, William K. McVisk and Nicholas Anaclerio, Jr., of Peterson & Ross, Chicago, for amici curiae CGH Medical Center et al.
Thaddeus J. Nodzenski and Mark D. Deaton, Naperville, amici curiae Illinois Hosp. Ass'n et al.
Timothy J. Ashe, Rudolf G. Schade, Jr., and Lynn D. Dowd, of Cassidy, Schade & Gloor, Chicago, for amicus curiae Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council.
Bruce Robert Pfaff, Chicago, for amicus curiae Illinois Trial Lawyers Ass'n.
Stephen R. Swofford and Bruce L. Carmen, of Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, for amicus curiae Appellate Lawyers Ass'n.
Rosalyn B. Kaplan, Chicago, for amicus curiae Atty. Gen. of State of Ill.
O'Reilly, Cunningham, Norton & Mancini, Wheaton (William F. Cunningham and Mary A. Strunk, of counsel), for appellant Dreyer Medical Clinic.
John M. Lamont, of Thompson, Lamont & Flaherty, P.C., Aurora, for appellees Judith Testin et al.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Justice HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court:
Before us are two medical malpractice actions which have not yet gone to trial. In each case, defense counsel filed a pretrial discovery motion to obtain authorization to conduct ex parte interviews with one of the plaintiff's treating physicians. In cause No. 74831, the motion to interview was granted, but the appellate court subsequently reversed after holding...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
