1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 862 F.Supp.
  5. 862 F.Supp. 1035 (1994)
 

STATE OF N.Y. v. KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INC.

No. 93 Civ. 811 (KMW).

862 F.Supp. 1035 (1994)

STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INC., Nabisco Cereals, Inc., Nabisco, Inc., Philip Morris Companies Inc., RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp., and RJR Nabisco Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 12, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Malone, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Oliver Koppell, Atty. Gen., New York City, for plaintiff.

Abe Krash, Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, for Kraft.

Richard C. Weisberg, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, for Nabisco and RJR Nabisco.

OPINION AND ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.

Plaintiff State of New York ("the State") has renewed its motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, the State's motion is hereby denied.

BACKGROUND

Much of the background of this antitrust action is set forth in the court's Opinion and Order of June 14, 1993, denying the State's first motion for a preliminary injunction. Familiarity with that opinion is assumed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases