1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 853 F.Supp.
  5. 853 F.Supp. 1038 (1994)
 

DAWSON v. W. & H. VOORTMAN, LTD.

No. 92 C 8088.

853 F.Supp. 1038 (1994)

Ronald DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. W. & H. VOORTMAN, LIMITED, a Canadian Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Kaplan, Edward Kaplan & Associates, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

John Joseph Reidy, Timothy Scott Breems, Ruff, Weidenaar & Reidy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendant W. & H. Voortman, Ltd. ("Voortman"), to dismiss the twelve-count Complaint of plaintiff Ronald Dawson in its entirety. The motion is brought pursuant to both Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and Rule 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases