1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 871 P.2d
  5. 871 P.2d 1018 (1994)
 

OREGON STATE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE

UP-38-92; CA A80480.

871 P.2d 1018 (1994)

127 Or. App. 144

OREGON STATE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. STATE of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 30, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jaime B. Goldberg, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jeffrey S. Witt and Hoag, Vick, Tarantino & Garrettson.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., RICHARDSON, C.J., and RIGGS, J.

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, the exclusive bargaining representative of certain state employees, filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the Employment Relations Board (ERB), contending that the state had unlawfully refused to bargain over the impact of the sale of a state-owned structure in which the employees park, and had thereby unilaterally changed an employment practice. ORS 243.672(1)(e). The essence of the complaint is that the new owner of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases