1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 97 Ohio
  5. 97 Ohio App.3d 91 (1994)
 

STATE v. CONGER

Nos. 712, 713.

97 Ohio App.3d 91 (1994)

The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. CONGER, Appellee. (Two cases.)

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Jackson County.

Decided September 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oths & Heiser, Joseph A. Oths and Christopher J. Regan, for appellants.

Charles A. Gerken, Special Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

FAIN, Judge.

Defendants-appellants Joe and Mary Lou Conger appeal from their convictions and sentences for attempted tampering with ballots in violation of R.C. 3599.26.

The Congers contend that on the undisputed facts they are not guilty as a matter of law. They further contend that the statutes under which they were prosecuted, R.C. 3505.24 and 3599.26, are unconstitutionally vague.

We reject the Congers' interpretation of the applicable statutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases