PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges a judgment and sentence entered upon an order revoking his probation. At the revocation hearing the appellant maintained that he did not willfully violate certain conditions of his probation. The court's oral pronouncement and the written order both fail to identify the specific conditions which the appellant may have violated so as to provide a basis for revocation. The order is thus deficient. See Brundage v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.