STATE v. GAYNOR

91CR0812FE; CA A74473.

880 P.2d 947 (1994)

130 Or. App. 99

STATE of Oregon, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Stephen Phillip GAYNOR, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant—cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent—cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of intentional murder. ORS 163.115(1)(a). In the alternative, he seeks a remand for resentencing. On cross-appeal, the state argues that the trial court should have imposed a life term of post-prison supervision, rather than a 36-month term. We affirm on appeal and on cross-appeal.

Defendant contends that because the state failed to prove that he intended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases