AUTOMOTIVE CENT. SERV. v. EMPLOY. DIV.

92-T-0107A; CA A81086.

880 P.2d 940 (1994)

130 Or. App. 60

AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Churnside, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gaydos, Churnside & Walro, P.C.

Youlee Yim You, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Employment Division (the Division)1 that tool rent paid by employer to its employees was a disguised wage that should be treated as taxable payroll for purposes of assessing unemployment insurance taxes. ORS 657.684. We affirm.

Employer operates an automobile repair business that specializes in commercial fleet service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases