PARRO, Judge.
This case involves a coverage dispute between insurers over the interpretation of a "per occurrence" clause in an insurance policy. The trial court determined coverage should be based on a finding of two occurrences instead of only one occurrence. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 5, 1989, Bennett & Peters, Inc. ("Bennett & Peters"), a firm of forestry consultants and managers, conducted what is known...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.