MILEY v. CONTINENTAL INS. CO.

No. 93 CA 1652.

645 So.2d 1166 (1994)

Donald MILEY, et al. v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

September 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Perry, Jr., Mathews, Atkinson, Guglielmo, Marks & Day, Baton Rouge, appellees, Hartford Ins. and Indemnity Co.

Boris F. Navratil, Navratil, Hardy & Bourgeois, Baton Rouge, appellants, Glens Falls Ins. Co. and Boston Old Colony Ins. Co.

Before GONZALES, PITCHER and PARRO, JJ.


PARRO, Judge.

This case involves a coverage dispute between insurers over the interpretation of a "per occurrence" clause in an insurance policy. The trial court determined coverage should be based on a finding of two occurrences instead of only one occurrence. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 5, 1989, Bennett & Peters, Inc. ("Bennett & Peters"), a firm of forestry consultants and managers, conducted what is known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases