HOECHST CELANESE CORP. v. ARTHUR BROS.

No. 13-93-077-CV.

882 S.W.2d 917 (1994)

HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION, D/B/A Hoechst Celanese Plastics Company, Appellant, v. ARTHUR BROS., INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

August 31, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberta J. Hegland, Clay E. Coalson, and David A. Sibley, Meredith, Donnell & Abernethy, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

J. Norman Thomas, Harris & Thomas, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

Before KENNEDY, GILBERTO HINOJOSA, and FEDERICO HINOJOSA, Jr., JJ.


OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

KENNEDY, Justice.

After considering appellee's motion for rehearing, we withdraw our opinion of July 21, 1994 and enter this opinion in its place. We otherwise deny the motion for rehearing. The appellant's motion for rehearing was also overruled.

Arthur Brothers, Inc. ("ABI") recovered damages against Hoechst Celanese Corporation ("HCC") based on findings of fraud and promissory estoppel. The jury found that HCC lied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases