1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 883 P.2d
  5. 883 P.2d 898 (1994)
 

STATE v. MILOSEVICH

10-92-09745A, 10-92-09745B; CA A80779 (Control), CA A80780.

883 P.2d 898 (1994)

131 Or. App. 51

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Steven Mark MILOSEVICH, Respondent, STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Nicholas Daniel MILOSEVICH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 26, 1994.

Review Denied December 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Steven V. Humber, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

In these two cases, consolidated for appeal, the state appeals from an order suppressing evidence found at the defendants' residence. ORS 138.060. The court held that the affidavit supporting the search warrant was legally insufficient. We reverse.

A search warrant was issued for the Eugene residence of both defendants based on the affidavit of a Lane County Deputy Sheriff. The affidavit described the discovery by Forest Service officers of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases