1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 869 P.2d
  5. 869 P.2d 889 (1994)
 

CATES v. JORDISON

91-12440; CA A77614.

869 P.2d 889 (1994)

126 Or. App. 588

In the Matter of the Compensation of Daniel R. Jordison, Claimant. Dean T. CATES, dba Cates Construction, Petitioner, v. Daniel R. JORDISON and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Wm. Davis, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Davis & Bostwick.

Karen Stolzberg, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent Daniel R. Jordison. With her on the brief was Goldberg & Mechanic.

Michael O. Whitty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and De MUNIZ, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that dismissed his request for a hearing on SAIF's acceptance of claimant's injury claim. He assigns error to the conclusion that issue preclusion bars him from litigating the issue of compensability. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298 and ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Claimant suffered an on-the-job injury in 1988. The Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) issued a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases