PER CURIAM.
In this direct appeal of his judgment and sentence based on a plea of no contest, appellant contends the trial court erred in sentencing him as an habitual offender because he was not advised sufficiently of the exact collateral consequences of the sentence. Appellant further contends the court erred in imposing probation to follow the habitual offender sentences as to three counts because probation was not part of the plea agreement. Appellant did not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
