1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 879 P.2d
  5. 879 P.2d 863 (1994)
 

IN RE SCHENCK

OSB 90-113, 93-5; SC S40157.

879 P.2d 863 (1994)

320 Or. 94

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Ronald D. SCHENCK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald D. Schenck, accused, argued the cause and filed the briefs in pro. per.

Robert L. Cowling, Bar Counsel, Medford, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, filed the response for the Oregon State Bar.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ., and RICHARDSON, J. Pro Tem.

PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with one violation of DR 7-104(A)(1) (communicating with a person represented by counsel)1 and two violations of DR 7-110(B) (improper communication with a judge as to the merits of a cause)2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (Code). A trial panel of the Disciplinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases