1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 23 Cal.App.4th
  5. 23 Cal.App.4th 1713 (1994)
 

CITY OF CHULA VISTA v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Docket No. D018644.

23 Cal.App.4th 1713 (1994)

29 Cal. Rptr.2d 89

CITY OF CHULA VISTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respondent; APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES II, INC., Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 9, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney, John M. Appelbaum, Deputy City Attorney, Worley, Schwartz, Garfield & Rice and Charles V. Berwanger for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Latham & Watkins, David L. Mulliken and Daniel E. Butcher for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr., County Counsel, Diane Bardsley, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Scott H. Peters and Mark C. Mead, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WORK, Acting P.J.

The City of Chula Vista (City) appeals a judgment1 dismissing its action after the court sustained demurrers by the County of San Diego (County) and Appropriate Technologies II, Inc. (Aptec) without leave to amend. The City had petitioned for writ and other relief after the County approved an agreement allowing Aptec to continue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases