1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 865 F.Supp.
  5. 865 F.Supp. 850 (1994)
 

TIMKEN CO. v. U.S.

Slip Op. 94-150, Court No. 92-03-00162.

865 F.Supp. 850 (1994)

The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation and NTN Corporation; Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.; and NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart and Stewart, Eugene L. Stewart, Terence P. Stewart, James R. Cannon, Jr., William A. Fennell, Julie Chasen Ross, Patrick J. McDonough and Edith A. Eisner, Washington, DC, for plaintiff, the Timken Co.

Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Velta A. Melnbrencis, Asst. Director (Linda S. Chang and Joan L. MacKenzie, Attorney-Advisors, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, of counsel), for defendant.

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, Robert E. Burke, Donald J. Unger, Jesse M. Gerson and Lawrence M. Friedman, Chicago, IL, for defendant-intervenors, NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp. and NTN Corp.

Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Peter O. Suchman, Susan P. Strommer and Niall P. Meagher, Washington, DC, for defendants-intervenors, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corp. of U.S.A.

Coudert Brothers, Robert A. Lipstein, Matthew P. Jaffe, Nathan V. Holt and Grace W. Lawson, Washington, DC, for defendants-intervenors, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corp.

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff, The Timken Company ("Timken"), challenges certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's ("Commerce") final results of the second administrative review of certain tapered roller bearings ("TRBs") from Japan. Tapered Roller Bearings, Finished and Unfinished, and Parts Thereof, From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review ("Final Results")...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases