1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 850 F.Supp.
  5. 850 F.Supp. 861 (1994)
 

CALMAR, INC. v. EMSON RESEARCH, INC.

No. CV 92-4770 DT (JGx).

850 F.Supp. 861 (1994)

CALMAR, INC., Plaintiff, v. EMSON RESEARCH, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter D. Ames, Lawrence R. Radanovic, Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D.C., and David E. Wheeler, Schlessinger & Wheeler, Beverly Hills, CA, for plaintiff.

Charles R. Brainard, Albert J. Breneisen, James E. Geringer, John W. Bateman and P. McCoy Smith, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, and Jonathan P. Chodos, Santa Monica, CA, for defendant.

ORDER GRANTING EMSON'S MOTION TO AMEND ITS ANSWER; ORDER DENYING EMSON'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE TRIAL OF THE ISSUE OF WILLFULNESS AND TO STAY DISCOVERY OF RELATED ATTORNEY OPINIONS; ORDER GRANTING EMSON'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.

Background

This action arises out of an alleged patent infringement. Defendant Emson Research, Inc. ("Emson") alleges it has been making the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases