MUMFORD v. CSX TRANSP.

No. 3:93CV00377.

878 F.Supp. 827 (1994)

Thaddaus MUMFORD, Plaintiff, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Rockingham Division.

September 12, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Sheely, Regan A. Miller, Charlotte, NC, for plaintiff.

Thomas A. Farr, Gretchen W. Ewalt, Catherine Ann Potter, Raleigh, NC, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

TILLEY, District Judge.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment in this Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and state law case pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because Plaintiff has established material facts in issue as to the discriminatory discharge and retaliatory discharge claims, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

I.

The facts, stated most favorably to Mr. Mumford...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases