PLUESS-STAUFER v. ROLLASON ENG. & MFG.

No. 93-1356.

635 So.2d 1070 (1994)

PLUESS-STAUFER INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. ROLLASON ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael M. Bell and Andrew J. Leeper of Hannah, Marsee & Voght, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Bruce W. Flower, Maitland, and Leslie W. Jacobs and James B. Niehaus of Thompson, Hine and Flory, Cleveland, OH, for appellee.


W. SHARP, Judge.

Pluess-Staufer Industries (PSI), a Vermont corporation, appeals from a nonfinal order,1 granting in part and denying in part, its motion to dismiss Rollason's third amended complaint. The order dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, but gave Rollason twenty days to file a fourth amended complaint. It also found the complaint pled sufficient jurisdictional facts under the long-arm statute

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases