STATE v. COOPER

DC 91-2249-C; CA A72530; SC S40539.

874 P.2d 822 (1994)

319 Or. 162

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Mark K. COOPER, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 16, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy E. Alpaugh, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

James N. Varner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and GRABER, JJ.


FADELEY, Justice.

The issue in this criminal case is whether a city police officer who investigates charges of a state crime and charges a defendant with that crime may be designated by the state in a state criminal trial based on this charge as a representative of the state under the second exception to the rule governing exclusion of witnesses that is stated in OEC 615. Stating that exception, OEC 615(2) in part provides:

"At the request of a party the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases