STATE v. CAMPBELL

91-61560; CA A78644.

876 P.2d 799 (1994)

128 Or. App. 592

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Joseph CAMPBELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 22, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.


HASELTON, Judge.

Defendant, who was convicted for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), asserts that the sentencing court exceeded its authority in imposing a condition of probation that requires defendant to submit, under certain circumstances, to breath, blood, or field sobriety tests upon the request of any peace officer. We remand for entry of a modified judgment.1

The disputed probation condition provides:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases