SPRADLING v. STATE

No. 01-91-00819-CR.

880 S.W.2d 792 (1994)

Hubert Richard SPRADLING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

January 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis Dugas, Orange, for appellant.

Stephen C. Howard, Terrence Holmes, Orange, for appellee.

Before OLIVER-PARROTT, C.J., and COHEN and WILSON, JJ.


OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of driving while intoxicated, found an enhancement paragraph true, and assessed punishment at nine-years confinement and a $9,500 fine. In a single point of error, appellant challenges the admission of the audio from the DWI videotape. We affirm.

Appellant asserts the trial court erred in admitting the audio portion of his videotaped sobriety test. Appellant cites the statute

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases