1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 885 P.2d
  5. 885 P.2d 786 (1994)
 

PRATT v. PRODATA, INC.

No. 910248.

885 P.2d 786 (1994)

John P. PRATT, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PRODATA, INC., an Idaho corporation doing business in Utah as Pro-Star, Will McCoy, an individual, and Does 1 through 5, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berne S. Broadbent, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Eric C. Olson, Salt Lake City, for defendants.

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Defendants Will McCoy and Prodata, Inc., appeal from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff John Pratt. The jury found that defendants intentionally interfered with Pratt's prospective economic relations with the Utah Department of Transportation ("UDOT"). On appeal, defendants contend that (i) several of the jury's findings are not supported by sufficient evidence; (ii) the jury's finding on proximate cause is unsound as a matter of law; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases