1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 868 P.2d
  5. 868 P.2d 788 (1994)
 

ADAMS v. HUNTER ENGINEERING CO.

C900871CV; CA A73644.

868 P.2d 788 (1994)

126 Or. App. 392

Jack ADAMS, Appellant, v. HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY, Respondent, and William Ensley, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lauren Paulson, Aloha, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Charles F. Adams, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Joel A. Mullin and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant Hunter Engineering Company1 on each of plaintiff's two contract claims. He assigns error to the trial court's granting of defendant's motion for directed verdict, to the denial of plaintiff's motion for sanctions against defendant and to the award of attorney fees to defendant as a sanction against plaintiff for failing to admit a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases