RAIMONDO v. AMAX, INC.

Civ. No. 5-88-163 (WWE).

843 F.Supp. 806 (1994)

George J. RAIMONDO v. AMAX, INC.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart M. Casper, Casper & De Toledo, Stamford, CT, Walter B. Connolly Jr., Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Detroit, MI, Victoria De Toledo, Casper & De Toledo, Stamford, CT, William I. Haslun II, Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara, Greenwich, CT, Edward T. Krumeich, Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara, Greenwich, CT, Alison B. Marshall, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Washington, DC, Alison B. Marshall, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Detroit, MI,


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, George Raimondo, brought this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., alleging that the defendant fired him because of his age. On January 16, 1992, a jury found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded $201,864 in back pay and $234,339 for loss of pension. The instant ruling concerns only the issue of front pay damages. Following hearings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases