BEATY v. GRADY, HARPER & CARLSON

8912-07123; CA A77078.

868 P.2d 778 (1994)

126 Or. App. 388

Daniel E. BEATY, Appellant, v. GRADY, HARPER & CARLSON, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 16, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann.

William Stockton, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Barbara L. Johnston and Brisbee & Stockton.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted a motion for partial summary judgment entered in favor of defendant. On our own motion, we conclude that the trial court lacked authority to enter that judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and remand with instructions to vacate the judgment.

Plaintiff asserts a single claim for negligence. He alleges that he was injured at work when he fell from a steel beam approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases