CADLE CO. II v. SCHELLMAN

9010-06618; CA A74069.

868 P.2d 773 (1994)

126 Or. App. 372

CADLE COMPANY II, an Oregon corporation, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Armond SCHELLMAN, Defendant, and Mark SCHELLMAN, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 16, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Morris, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Bennett & Hartman.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the briefs were Richard M. Layne, Portland, and Michael W. Peterkin, Bend.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendant Mark Schellman1 appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment subjecting a houseboat and other equipment to execution on a prior judgment. We reverse in part on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

This case involves the application of the Fraudulent Transfers and Conveyances Act (Act). ORS 95.200 et seq. We review de novo, Allen v. Meinig...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases