ARCHER v. LETICA CORP.

89-2012; CA A74792.

868 P.2d 770 (1994)

126 Or. App. 309

Winifred ARCHER, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. LETICA CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Glenn Terris, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hank McCurdy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. On the opening brief were Jeanette Bello and Dobbins & McCurdy. With him on the reply brief were David S. Mepham and Dobbins & McCurdy.

I. Franklin Hunsaker, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

In this wrongful discharge case, plaintiff appeals and defendant Letica Corporation1 cross-appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff.2 We reverse on the cross-appeal and consequently affirm on the appeal.

Defendant argues on its cross-appeal that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in denying its motion for directed verdict. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases