1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 21 Cal.App.4th
  5. 21 Cal.App.4th 1611 (1994)
 

COLLISSON & KAPLAN v. HARTUNIAN

Docket No. B072128.

21 Cal.App.4th 1611 (1994)

26 Cal. Rptr.2d 786

COLLISSON & KAPLAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEVEN HARTUNIAN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

January 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ginsburg, Stephan, Oringher & Richman, David S. Richman, Sklar, Levinson & Dornstein and Daniel M. Sklar for Defendants and Appellants.

Billet & Kaplan, Terry S. Kaplan, Phyllis G. Pollack and Jordan Trachtenberg for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

MASTERSON, J.

Steven Hartunian and Sumitomo Tower, Ltd. (defendants), attempted to derail a fast track case through evasive answers to discovery. As a sanction for this conduct, the trial court ordered defendants' answer struck. Defendants appeal from the ensuing default judgment. We affirm the judgment and impose sanctions against defendants and their attorneys for having prosecuted a frivolous appeal.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases