CALOCERINOS & SPINA v. PRUDENTIAL REINSURANCE CO.

Nos. 92-CV-6508T, 93-CV-6055T.

856 F.Supp. 775 (1994)

CALOCERINOS & SPINA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., and Continental Casualty Company, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL REINSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MUESER-RUTLEDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, f/k/a Mueser, Wentworth, Johnston & DeSimone, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL REINSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

July 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Yesawich, III, Harris, Beach & Wilcox, Rochester, NY, for plaintiffs.

Vincent J. Vitkowsky, Steven C. Schwartz, Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, New York City, for defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

TELESCA, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in these consolidated diversity actions brought suit seeking a declaration that they are covered under Prudential Reinsurance Policy PSL00001 ("the Policy"). Both plaintiffs and defendant have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I hold that neither plaintiff is entitled to coverage under the policy and therefore deny plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment. Defendant's motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases