OPINION ON STATE'S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted Appellant of robbery and assessed his punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment after finding he was a habitual offender. This conviction was reversed. Boston v. State,
The Court of Appeals held that Article 36.01, V.A.C.C.P., allows a defendant to make an opening statement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.