SEAL-FLEX, INC. v. ATHLETIC TRACK AND COURT CONST.

No. 91-CV-76949-DT.

870 F.Supp. 753 (1994)

SEAL-FLEX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ATHLETIC TRACK AND COURT CONSTRUCTION, a Michigan corporation, and McBroom Construction, a foreign corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

Order for Entry of Final Judgment October 18, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas N. Young, Krass & Young, Troy, MI, and Marshall G. MacFarlane, Krass & Young, Ann Arbor, MI, for Seal-Flex, Inc. and Current Surfaces, Inc.

Gerald E. McGlynn, III, Bliss McGlynn, Bingham Farms, MI, Paul W. Harty, Farmington Hills, MI, Owen E. Perry, Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry & Milton, Troy, MI, for Athletic Track and Court Const.

Thomas A. Hallin, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Troy, MI, for McBroom Const.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ATCC'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HACKETT, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement/invalidity action arising out of two patents which cover a method of installing rubberized athletic tracks. Defendant Athletic Track and Court Construction (ATCC) filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that the patents are invalid. For the reasons stated below, defendant ATCC's motion for partial summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases