1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 25 F.3d
  5. 25 F.3d 1566 (1994)
 

CREDLE v. BOND

93-1447. (Interference No. 101,823).

25 F.3d 1566 (1994)

William S. CREDLE, Jr. and Debra Boone Overman, Appellant, v. Curtis J. BOND, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony L. Birch, Birch, Stewart, KJolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Terrell C. Birch. Of counsel was Thomas R. Boston.

Thomas R. Boland, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

William S. Credle, Jr. and Debra Boone Overman (Boone) appeal from the reconsideration decision of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences (Board) awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by the interference count to Curtis J. Bond.1 For the reasons set forth below, we reverse-in-part, affirm-in-part, and remand.

I

Boone filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases