HOOK v. B.C. INV., INC.

No. 19926.

872 P.2d 716 (1994)

125 Idaho 453

Emma Lou HOOK and Wayne D. Hook, wife and husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. B.C. INVESTMENT, INC., an Idaho corporation, d/b/a Harold's Foods, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, North Idaho, October 1993 Term.

April 18, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beard, St. Clair, Peterson, Sullivan & Barber, Idaho Falls, for appellant. John G. St. Clair argued.

Cooke, LaManna, Smith & Cogswell, Priest River, for respondents. Nicholas M. LaManna argued.


BISTLINE, Justice.

This is an appeal by B.C. Investment, Inc. (BCI) of the district court's granting of a new trial for Emma Lou Hook on the issue of damages in a personal injury action. After a jury trial in which BCI was found liable for Hook's injury and limited damages were awarded to Hook, the district court ordered a new trial on the issue of damages, pursuant to I.R.C.P. 59(a)(7), because it determined that there had been a significant typographical error in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases