1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 22 Cal.App.4th
  5. 22 Cal.App.4th 1553 (1994)
 

HANOOKA v. PIVKO

Docket No. B072854.

22 Cal.App.4th 1553 (1994)

28 Cal. Rptr.2d 70

IZHAK HANOOKA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. JACK PIVKO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

March 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kinsella, Boesch, Fujikawa & Towle, Philip W. Boesch, Jr., and David A. Pash for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hillsinger & Costanzo, Sarah Yoseloff, Jane O'Donnell, Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols and Keith Staub for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

NOTT, J.

We are asked to determine whether a plaintiff's service of defendant doctors at the hospital where they maintained staff privileges complies with the notice provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 364 in order to extend the statute of limitations, and if not, whether relief can be granted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 473. We answer both questions in the negative.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases