1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 719 (1994)
 

CROMMIE v. STATE OF CAL., PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N

Nos. C 89-4433 BAC, C 90-1150 BAC.

840 F.Supp. 719 (1994)

Maurice CROMMIE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, et al. Defendants. Arthur A. MANGOLD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 5, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Rogers, Mayo & Rogers, Madeleine Tress, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs.

Ephraim Margolin, Arthur Brunwasser, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

ORDER

CAULFIELD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs in these actions prevailed at trial on their age discrimination claims under two alternative theories of liability: the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"). Based on the jury's findings, plaintiffs now seek attorneys' fees and costs under state law as provided in Cal.Gov't Code § 12965(b) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases